News

Recruitment crisis: Teacher training bursaries vs teacher retention payments

A new study into the impact of teacher retention payments suggest they may have a “useful role” to play but are less cost-effective than teacher training bursaries.
Useful tool? The new research study has found that across five teacher retention payment schemes, there was a “not statistically significant” reduction in the leaving rate of just 0.7 percentage points - Adobe Stock

The research paper has been published by the National Foundation for Education Research (Worth & McLean, 2025) and focuses on the impact of five specific retention payment schemes.

It suggests that the payments could help to keep early career teachers in the classroom, especially in shortage subjects – but the evidence is “far from conclusive”.

As such, the NFER is advising ministers that retention payment schemes need to be “carefully targeted and used alongside high bursaries and wider recruitment and retention strategies”.

The research considers the impact of all five schemes that have been piloted since 2018:

All five provide targeted payments to teachers in the early years of their careers (usually within the first five years, with loan reimbursements paid to teachers in their first 10 years) who are teaching shortage secondary subjects (including maths, physics, chemistry, computing, languages and biology).

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting SecEd and reading some of our content for professionals in secondary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcast

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday and Thursday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here