Blogs

We mustn't be afraid to challenge the status quo

Government policy
Government action on the summer-born children issue is welcome, but has got SecEd editor Pete Henshaw thinking about how difficult it can be to change the age-old structures of education

The issue of summer-born children and their often-challenging path through the schools system is a long-standing debate in education.

Children usually start school in the September after they turn 4, but many parents of summer-born children ask to delay entry to reception for a year. However, the problems begin when local authorities and schools force these children to go straight into year 1, skipping reception, when they do begin school. There is all manner of research showing that the achievement and attainment of these children suffers as they are forced to learn alongside much older (relatively) children.

The impact stretches, believe it or not, all the way to GCSE examinations. One study in 2013 found that a child born in August is 6.4 per cent less likely to get five GCSEs at A* to C than one born in September. The report, from the Institute of Fiscal Studies, said the problem was purely down to the organisation of the education system, meaning that children born in the summer start school aged up to a year younger than their peers and as a result are tested at a younger age.

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting SecEd and reading some of our content for professionals in secondary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcast

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday and Thursday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here