The government’s Post-16 Skills Plan seeks to boost the status of technical education, but why wait until 16 asks Lucy Thompson

Just over a year ago, the government released its Post-16 Skills Plan. In the introduction to the plan, the then skills minister, Nick Boles wrote: “Reforming the skills system is one of the most important challenges we face as a country. Getting it right is crucial to our future prosperity, and to the life chances of millions of people”.

This statement now rings truer than ever as we look towards a future outside of the European Union and the potential skills shortages that it may bring with it.

However, the plan also sets out their ambition “that every young person, after an excellent grounding in the core academic subjects and a broad and balanced curriculum to age 16, is presented with two choices: the academic or the technical option”. My counter to this would be: Why the focus on academia pre-16?

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting SecEd and reading some of our content for professionals in secondary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcast

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday and Thursday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here