Blogs

Exam standards and the GCSE controversy

The GCSE controversy has revealed the 'strange mix' of criterion and norm-referencing which is at the heart of our exam system. Dr John Dunford, chairman of the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors, offers a commentary.

There are several levels of significance in what has come to be known on Twitter and elsewhere as the “GCSE fiasco”.

Of greatest importance is the significance for the individual students whose futures may be adversely affected by the GCSE grade decisions.

Then there is the significance for schools and colleges, not only in terms of league table scores but also in the entry arrangements for post-16 courses. 

There is significance for teachers, whose students achieved lower grades than they predicted. For many years, the more experienced teachers have been predicting their students’ results with a good degree of accuracy – and suddenly they learn that their predictions are too high. And teachers, having worked to raise student aspirations, care about what their students have achieved too.

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting SecEd and reading some of our content for professionals in secondary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcast

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday and Thursday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here