Blogs

Draft science curriculum is not fit for the 21st century

Curriculum
A science curriculum which doesn't teach puberty to primary pupils and ignores sexual disease, adolescence and hormones at key stage 3 is not fit for the 21st century, argues Dr Hilary Emery.

The government has set out its commendable ambition for an “open and honest culture about sex and relationships” in the new Framework for Sexual Health Improvement.

Many years ago, as an NQT, it fell to me to lead sex and relationships education (SRE) in a small rural primary school. What always struck me was how important it was for children to be able to talk about the things they were anxious or unsure about.

I always made sure after these lessons that I was on playground or lunch duty and invariably children would come to have conversations about things they wanted more information about.

Register now, read forever

Thank you for visiting SecEd and reading some of our content for professionals in secondary education. Register now for free to get unlimited access to all content.

What's included:

  • Unlimited access to news, best practice articles and podcast

  • New content and e-bulletins delivered straight to your inbox every Monday and Thursday

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here